What TCP port to use with SeaCat

Introduction

SeaCat requires to specify one TCP port that is eventually used for client-gateway communication. Clients connect to this port to establish TLS channel that is used to exchange requests and related responses. SPDY-based communication protocol is used for traffic in this channel.

SeaCat protocol stack
SeaCat: Protocol stack

TCP ports reachability

Google performed investigation during WebSocket implementation (late 2009) that showed surprising facts about success rate of client-to-server connections:

  • HTTP port 80: 67%
  • Custom TCP port (61985): 86%
  • HTTPS port 443: 95%

The reason for low HTTP score is that the Internet is today full of proxies and firewalls that are configured to be transparent to HTTP traffic. However, non-HTTP traffic doesn't successfully pass them. Detailed reasoning can be found here: SPDY Essentials presentation from Google at approx. 18th minute of the video.

443 or custom port

SeaCat communication protocol is up to Session layer compatible with HTTPS protocol stack, HTTPS client that connects to SeaCat gateway is politely rejected with no harm on both sides. SeaCat traffic is indistinguishable from HTTPS traffic for intermediates on the network path, and,therefore, it shares the same success rate of connections. For these reasons TCP port 443 is recommended choice for SeaCat.

If for whatever reason you cannot use this port, use any TCP port above 1024 (non-reserved ports). You will likely got little bit worst connection success rate but still useful for practical deployments in common network scenarios.

Need help?

Do you want to review your SeaCat-related design proposal?

Do you have a question we didn’t cover?

Do you want to give some feedback?

Feel free to contact us support@teskalabs.com.

About the Author

Ales Teska

TeskaLabs’ founder and CEO, Ales Teska, is a driven innovator who proactively builds things and comes up with solutions to solve practical IT problems.




You Might Be Interested in Reading These Articles

What Is Mobile Application Containerization or Wrapper, and Why It Needs to Go?

Containerization is an alternative for full machine virtualization. You probably know well-known containerization technology from Docker or Rocket. However, this article addresses the pros and cons of mobile “containerization” or wrapper used to isolate the mobile app from the mobile operating system or other applications installed on the same device. These type of “containerization” work in a different way.

Continue reading ...

tech security

Published on September 27, 2016

What’s The Difference Between Seacat and VPN?

One of the most common questions people asked us is if SeaCat some kind of a VPN? It's not. Virtual Private Network (VPN) extends a private network across a public network, providing secure connectivity from/to a mobile device. Every application on this device, thus now has access to the private network through the channel opened by VPN. This is safe up to a certain level because it is almost impossible to ensure the integrity of every application on the devices. Especially now when there are apps for everything, and users can download them from Google Play and the Apple store.

Continue reading ...

tech

Published on November 25, 2014

SeaCat Tutorial - Chapter 5: Using Parse.com with REST Integration (iOS)

As the market with Cloud Computing and Mobile devices is getting bigger, there is another specific option available. It's called (Mobile)Backend-As-A-Service (BAAS) and it is extremely useful in situations we want to subscribe a complex backend service (alongside the core backend solution, there is usually a lot of additional functionality and statistics) and primary focus on development of client part of mobile apps for instance.

Continue reading ...

tech tutorial ios osx

Published on January 31, 2015