What TCP port to use with SeaCat

Introduction

SeaCat requires to specify one TCP port that is eventually used for client-gateway communication. Clients connect to this port to establish TLS channel that is used to exchange requests and related responses. SPDY-based communication protocol is used for traffic in this channel.

SeaCat protocol stack
SeaCat: Protocol stack

TCP ports reachability

Google performed investigation during WebSocket implementation (late 2009) that showed surprising facts about success rate of client-to-server connections:

  • HTTP port 80: 67%
  • Custom TCP port (61985): 86%
  • HTTPS port 443: 95%

The reason for low HTTP score is that the Internet is today full of proxies and firewalls that are configured to be transparent to HTTP traffic. However, non-HTTP traffic doesn't successfully pass them. Detailed reasoning can be found here: SPDY Essentials presentation from Google at approx. 18th minute of the video.

443 or custom port

SeaCat communication protocol is up to Session layer compatible with HTTPS protocol stack, HTTPS client that connects to SeaCat gateway is politely rejected with no harm on both sides. SeaCat traffic is indistinguishable from HTTPS traffic for intermediates on the network path, and,therefore, it shares the same success rate of connections. For these reasons TCP port 443 is recommended choice for SeaCat.

If for whatever reason you cannot use this port, use any TCP port above 1024 (non-reserved ports). You will likely got little bit worst connection success rate but still useful for practical deployments in common network scenarios.

Need help?

Do you want to review your SeaCat-related design proposal?

Do you have a question we didn’t cover?

Do you want to give some feedback?

Feel free to contact us support@teskalabs.com.

About the Author

Ales Teska

TeskaLabs’ founder and CEO, Ales Teska, is a driven innovator who proactively builds things and comes up with solutions to solve practical IT problems.




You Might Be Interested in Reading These Articles

Software architect's point of view: Why use SeaCat

I've recently received an interesting question from one software architect: Why should he consider embedding SeaCat in his intended mobile application? This turned into a detailed discussion and I realised that not every benefit of SeaCat technology is apparent at first glance. Let me discuss the most common challenges of a software developer in the area of secure mobile communication and the way SeaCat helps to resolve them. The initial impulse for building SeaCat was actually out of frustration of repeating development challenges linked with implementation of secure mobile application communication. So let's talk about the most common challenges and how SeaCat address them.

Continue reading ...

tech development

Published on April 16, 2014

A beginner-friendly intro to the Correlator for effective cybersecurity detection

At TeskaLabs, we know that a cybersecurity system is only as effective as its ability to detect threats. That's why we developed a powerful tool that will prove essential in your arsenal: the Correlator.

Continue reading ...

security tech

Published on March 15, 2024

Log Management: Pre-implementation analysis

Pre-implementation analysis is a preparatory phase on the way to deploying a functional cybersecurity management system, i.e. TeskaLabs SIEM and security event management, Log Management. It is an integral and essential part of the entire implementation process, as it helps uncover any potential risks that may arise when deploying the mentioned SIEM and log management tools.

Continue reading ...

logman tech

Published on September 15, 2022