OpenSSL DROWN Vulnerability Affects Millions of HTTPS Websites and Software Supporting SSLv2
University researchers from Israel, Germany and the USA; together with Hashcat Project, OpenSSL community and Google; have recently published a paper reporting a critical vulnerability (CVE-2016-0800), which is also referred to as DROWN (Decrsypting RSA with Obsolete and Weakened eNcryption).
DROWN is caused by legacy OpenSSL SSLv2 protocol, which is known to have many deficiencies and thus, it is condemned since 1996. For many years, security experts have recommended to turn it off. There is no need to use this 20-year-old protocol, but apparently many servers still support it because disabling SSLv2 requires non-default reconfiguration of the SSL cryptographic settings which is not easy for common IT people who have limited security knowledge and don’t know the location to disable this protocol and the way to disable it.
This cross-protocol vulnerability allows the cyber attackers to exploit servers using SSLv2, thus decrypting secure communications based on SSL/TLS. “SSL traffic between clients and non-vulnerable servers can be decrypted too provided another server supporting SSLv2 (even with a different protocol such as SMTP, IMAP or POP) shares the RSA keys of the non-vulnerable server,” said OpenSSL organization. [1]
Hackers can take advantage of DROWN vulnerability and perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) type of attack. In a MitM attack, hackers trick the servers to steal the encryption key. They can use this key to decode encrypted messages and steal sensitive data like credit cards, email messages, passwords, trade secrets and financial information.
An example of a DROWN attack
Surprisingly, the world’s known brands [2] like Yahoo, Buzzfeed, Groupon, Sina have got their websites affected by DROWN vulnerability. Keeping this in view,it can be inferred that more companies still rely on servers that support this legacy protocol and are likely to fall a victim of cyber attacks.
OpenSSL is a cryptographic library used in many server products. It is difficult to know all the affected ones. The situation continue to becoming more urgent because the attack can be done in minutes, and the vulnerability is now disclosed. DROWN has been regarded as the new Heartbleed by many. Heartbleed is another OpenSSL vulnerability which was found in 2014. It is problematic and is one of the top five biggest security concerns for CIOs and CISOs in 2016 [3]. DROWN only affects SSLv2 while Heartbleed affects everything. Time will tell the impact of DROWN vulnerability.
Recommend solution
- Check web servers that implement OpenSSL, disable SSLv2 in your SSL configuration and upgrade your server software to the new OpenSSL version.
- Check certificates or keys and make sure that they are not used in servers or software that support SSLv2. If this is true, consider them as being compromised.
- Re-issuing a new certificate is not mandatory but can be taken as precautionary measure to prevent DROWN attacks.
How SeaCat keeps your backend resources safe from DROWN vulnerability?
SeaCat never implements SSLv2 protocol, having disabled it from day one. SeaCat uses TLS1.2 exclusively and has very strict configuration of ciphers. SeaCat Gateways are, therefore, unaffected. However, we still release an updated version of SeaCat with the new OpenSSL 1.0.2g.
SeaCat has also successfully fenced off other critical open source bugs like Heartbleed and Glibc.
SeaCat is the core technology behind SeaCat Mobile Secure Gateway and IoT/M2M Application Security Platform, which protects mobile, IoT/M2M applications, the communication channel and application backends.
If your mobile/IoT application is secured by SeaCat and monitored by our Network Security Center, you don’t have to worry. The application is immune from this vulnerability. If you are unsure, contact us today to request a FREE Demo or learn about our Application Security technology and how we can help you with the security of your mobile app and its backend systems.
Reference
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20160301.txt
- https://drownattack.com/top-sites.html
- http://www.cio.com/article/3023692/security/5-biggest-cybersecurity-concerns-facing-cios-cisos-in-2016.html
Photo credits: Imcreator
You Might Be Interested in Reading These Articles
The Two Real Challenges of the Internet of Things
Every week there is a new connected device on the market. A few days ago Tag Heuer launched its smartwatch with Google, and last week I saw a €39 sleep tracker in my supermarket plaster section. Tech conferences are buzzing about the Internet of Things (Consumer Electronics Show 2015, Pioneers Festival 2015).
Published on November 24, 2015
Android Nougat: Google OS' Tightest Security Yet
Officially released a month ago, the latest Google mobile OS version has made a few major adjustments, particularly in its security features. The search giant has improved the security in the Android Nougat (or also known as Android N) from strengthening the Android itself to some tools that helps developers to keep things as it is while users install apps.
Published on November 15, 2016
The World of Mobile Apps Is Not As Secure As You Think
Mobile app startup companies are notorious for cutting corners. One of the first things that is cut is security. After all, they have the big guys like Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon to protect mobile users, right? Wrong! All the way down the line. TechCrunch's article about security for mobile devices is an interesting theory on the state of security on the Internet. Although, they do hit the mark in the article about how companies fix the problem after the fact of the security breach.
Published on January 13, 2015
